MY SEARCH ENGINE

Wednesday, January 23, 2008

Antarctic Ice Loss Speeds up, Nearly Matches Greenland Loss

MEDIA RELATIONS OFFICE
JET PROPULSION LABORATORY
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
PASADENA, CALIF. 91109 TELEPHONE 818-354-5011
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov

Alan Buis 818-354-0474
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.
Alan.buis@jpl.nasa.gov

NEWS RELEASE: 2008-010 Jan. 23, 2008

Antarctic Ice Loss Speeds up, Nearly Matches Greenland Loss

PASADENA, Calif. – Ice loss in Antarctica increased by 75 percent in the last 10 years due to a
speed-up in the flow of its glaciers and is now nearly as great as that observed in Greenland,
according to a new, comprehensive study by NASA and university scientists.

In a first-of-its-kind study, an international team led by Eric Rignot of NASA's Jet Propulsion
Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif., and the University of California, Irvine, estimated changes in
Antarctica's ice mass between 1996 and 2006 and mapped patterns of ice loss on a glacier-by-
glacier basis. They detected a sharp jump in Antarctica's ice loss, from enough ice to raise global
sea level by 0.3 millimeters (.01 inches) a year in 1996, to 0.5 millimeters (.02 inches) a year in
2006.

Rignot said the losses, which were primarily concentrated in West Antarctica's Pine Island Bay
sector and the northern tip of the Antarctic Peninsula, are caused by ongoing and past
acceleration of glaciers into the sea. This is mostly a result of warmer ocean waters, which bathe
the buttressing floating sections of glaciers, causing them to thin or collapse. "Changes in
Antarctic glacier flow are having a significant, if not dominant, impact on the mass balance of the
Antarctic ice sheet," he said.

To infer the ice sheet's mass, the team measured ice flowing out of Antarctica's drainage basins
over 85 percent of its coastline. They used 15 years of satellite radar data from the European
Earth Remote Sensing-1 and -2, Canada's Radarsat-1 and Japan's Advanced Land Observing
satellites to reveal the pattern of ice sheet motion toward the sea. These results were compared
with estimates of snowfall accumulation in Antarctica's interior derived from a regional
atmospheric climate model spanning the past quarter century.

The team found that the net loss of ice mass from Antarctica increased from 112 (plus or minus
91) gigatonnes a year in 1996 to 196 (plus or minus 92) gigatonnes a year in 2006. A gigatonne is
one billion metric tons, or more than 2.2 trillion pounds. These new results are about 20 percent
higher over a comparable time frame than those of a NASA study of Antarctic mass balance last
March that used data from the NASA/German Aerospace Center Gravity Recovery and Climate
Experiment. This is within the margin of error for both techniques, each of which has its
strengths and limitations.

Rignot says the increased contribution of Antarctica to global sea level rise indicated by the study
warrants closer monitoring.

"Our new results emphasize the vital importance of continuing to monitor Antarctica using a
variety of remote sensing techniques to determine how this trend will continue and, in particular,
of conducting more frequent and systematic surveys of changes in glacier flow using satellite
radar interferometry," Rignot said. "Large uncertainties remain in predicting Antarctica's future
contribution to sea level rise. Ice sheets are responding faster to climate warming than
anticipated."

Rignot said scientists are now observing these climate-driven changes over a significant fraction
of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet, and the extent of the glacier ice losses is expected to keep rising
in the years to come. "Even in East Antarctica, where we find ice mass to be in near balance, ice
loss is detected in its potentially unstable marine sectors, warranting closer study," he said.

Other organizations participating in the NASA-funded study, in addition to the University of
California, Irvine, are Centro de Estudios Cientificos, Valdivia, Chile; University of Bristol,
United Kingdom; Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research, Utrecht University, Utrecht,
The Netherlands; University of Missouri, Columbia, Mo.; and the Royal Netherlands
Meteorological Institute, De Bilt, The Netherlands.

Results of the study are published in February's issue of Nature Geoscience.

Additional media contact for this story: Jennifer Fitzenberger, University of California, Irvine;
949-824-3969, jfitzen@uci.edu .

For more information, visit: http://www.nasa.gov .

JPL is managed for NASA by the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena.

-end-


To remove yourself from all mailings from NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, please go to http://www.kintera.org/TR.asp?a=aoIGJTMuGaIHLZJ&s=mwL6IdOVIiLSIcM1LwE&m=llL0LePRLfL6G

No comments: